Sundram v. City of Niagara Falls
44 A.D.2d 906, 356 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4898
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 30, 1974·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion at Special Term, Stiller, J. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara Special Term in proceeding to declare ordinance unconstitutional.) Present — Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Mahoney and Goldman, JJ. [77 Mise 2d 1002.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sundram v. City of Niagara Falls, 44 A.D.2d 906, 356 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).
44 A.D.2d 906 (Sundram v. City of Niagara Falls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Frolov v. Delo
86 Misc. 485 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)