Sundram v. City of Niagara Falls
44 A.D.2d 906, 356 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4898
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 30, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 44 A.D.2d 906 (Sundram v. City of Niagara Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sundram v. City of Niagara Falls, 44 A.D.2d 906, 356 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion at Special Term, Stiller, J. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara Special Term in proceeding to declare ordinance unconstitutional.) Present — Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Mahoney and Goldman, JJ. [77 Mise 2d 1002.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Frolov v. Delo
86 Misc. 485 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
44 A.D.2d 906, 356 N.Y.S.2d 1023, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sundram-v-city-of-niagara-falls-nyappdiv-1974.