Sundel v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided June 30, 1999·No. 98-1620·Unpublished

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 98-1620

WILLIAM HENRY SUNDEL,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES TAX COURT

Before

Lynch, Circuit Judge, Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lipez, Circuit Judge.

William H. Sundel on brief pro se. Loretta C. Argrett, Assistant Attorney General, Teresa E. McLaughlin and Robert J. Branman, Attorneys, Tax Division, Department of Justice, on brief for appellee.

June 29, 1999

Per Curiam. We have reviewed the record in this case, including the briefs of the parties. We affirm the decision of the United States Tax Court, essentially for the reasons given by the court in its memorandum findings of fact and opinion. Sundel v. Commissioner, 75 T.C.M. 1853 (1998). Any further points raised by petitioner in his brief to this court are without merit. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sundel v. Commissioner, (1st Cir. 1999).

Sundel v. Commissioner (Sundel v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sundel v. Commissioner
1998 T.C. Memo. 78 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)