Sundel v. Commissioner
This text of Sundel v. Commissioner (Sundel v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 98-1620
WILLIAM HENRY SUNDEL,
Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES TAX COURT
Before
Lynch, Circuit Judge, Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lipez, Circuit Judge.
William H. Sundel on brief pro se. Loretta C. Argrett, Assistant Attorney General, Teresa E. McLaughlin and Robert J. Branman, Attorneys, Tax Division, Department of Justice, on brief for appellee.
June 29, 1999
Per Curiam. We have reviewed the record in this case, including the briefs of the parties. We affirm the decision of the United States Tax Court, essentially for the reasons given by the court in its memorandum findings of fact and opinion. Sundel v. Commissioner, 75 T.C.M. 1853 (1998). Any further points raised by petitioner in his brief to this court are without merit. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sundel v. Commissioner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sundel-v-commissioner-ca1-1999.