Sundel v. Commissioner

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedJune 30, 1999
Docket98-1620
StatusUnpublished

This text of Sundel v. Commissioner (Sundel v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sundel v. Commissioner, (1st Cir. 1999).

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 98-1620

WILLIAM HENRY SUNDEL,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES TAX COURT

Before

Lynch, Circuit Judge, Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lipez, Circuit Judge.

William H. Sundel on brief pro se. Loretta C. Argrett, Assistant Attorney General, Teresa E. McLaughlin and Robert J. Branman, Attorneys, Tax Division, Department of Justice, on brief for appellee.

June 29, 1999

Per Curiam. We have reviewed the record in this case, including the briefs of the parties. We affirm the decision of the United States Tax Court, essentially for the reasons given by the court in its memorandum findings of fact and opinion. Sundel v. Commissioner, 75 T.C.M. 1853 (1998). Any further points raised by petitioner in his brief to this court are without merit. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sundel v. Commissioner
1998 T.C. Memo. 78 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sundel v. Commissioner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sundel-v-commissioner-ca1-1999.