Sunburst Farms, Inc. v. The United States

797 F.2d 973, 8 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1112, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 20318
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 8, 1986·No. 86-749·Published

Opinion

797 F.2d 973

8 ITRD 1112, 4 Fed. Cir. (T) 102

SUNBURST FARMS, INC., Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Appellee.

Appeal No. 86-749.

United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.

Aug. 8, 1986.

Sunburst Farms, Inc. appeals from the final judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, reported at 620 F.Supp. 735 (1985), which dismissed Sunburst Farm's challenge to the Customs Service's imposition of duties on cut flowers, item 192-21, TSUS, imported from Colombia. We affirm.

Thomas A. Rothwell, Jr. and Joseph A. Vicario, Jr., Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell, Washington, D.C., argued for appellant. With them on brief were Alfred G. Scholle and Christine C. Ryan.

Veronica A. Perry, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued for appellee. With her on brief were Richard K. Willard, Asst. Atty. Gen., David Cohen, Director, and Joseph I. Liebman, Attorney in Charge, Intern. Trade Field Office.

Before NIES, Circuit Judge, MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, and BISSELL, Circuit Judge.

OPINION

NIES, Circuit Judge.

Upon consideration of each of Sunburst Farms' arguments to the contrary, we conclude that the instant case is controlled by this court's holding in Florsheim Shoe Co. v. United States, 744 F.2d 787 (Fed.Cir.1984). Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of Chief Judge Re's opinion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sunburst Farms, Inc. v. The United States, 797 F.2d 973, 8 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1112, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 20318 (Fed. Cir. 1986).

797 F.2d 973 (Sunburst Farms, Inc. v. The United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sunburst Farms, Inc. v. United States
9 Ct. Int'l Trade 512 (Court of International Trade, 1985)
Sunburst Farms, Inc. v. United States
797 F.2d 973 (Federal Circuit, 1986)