Sunbeam Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
753 A.2d 1265, 562 Pa. 131, 2000 Pa. LEXIS 1462
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sunbeam Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance. Read the opinion of the Court — 566 Pa. 494 →
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th of June, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following three issues.
a. Whether insurers should be permitted to violate insurance regulatory laws by enforcing a policy exclusion in a manner different than was represented to gain approval for the exclusion’s use.
b. Whether, when interpreting the phrase “sudden and accidental” in an insurance contract, the court should consider the surrounding circumstances, including evidence that the wording has acquired an accepted meaning through usage in the trade, to determine whether there is an ambiguity in the contract wording.
c.Whether the phrase “sudden and accidental” in a standardized pollution exclusion should be interpreted to require that the release of pollutants be both “abrupt” and “last only a short time” when many courts have disagreed with this interpretation, it violates several canons of contract interpretation, and it conflicts with the meaning previously given to the phrase through usage in the trade • and in representations submitted to obtain regulatory approval to use the exclusion in Pennsylvania.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sunbeam Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance, 753 A.2d 1265, 562 Pa. 131, 2000 Pa. LEXIS 1462 (Pa. 2000).
753 A.2d 1265 (Sunbeam Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.