Sun Vapor Street-Light Co. v. City of Cedar Rapids

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa

Sun Vapor Street-Light Co. v. City of Cedar Rapids

41 F. 47, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 1952

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa

DecidedJanuary 3, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 41 F. 47 (Sun Vapor Street-Light Co. v. City of Cedar Rapids) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sun Vapor Street-Light Co. v. City of Cedar Rapids, 41 F. 47, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 1952 (circtnia 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Shihas, J.

In this ease it appears that the lamps used in lighting certain portions of the city of Cedar Rapids are furnished under a contract between the city and the Western Street-Light Company, it being charged in the bill that such lamps infringe letters patent Ño. 222.856 and No. 286,211. In the suit brought by the complainant against the Western Street-Light Company it has been decided that the charge of infringement was not made out, and it follows that the complainant has no ground for enjoining the use of these lamps by the city. Ante, 43. The bill is therefore dismissed, at complainant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shihas, J.

In this ease it appears that the lamps used in lighting certain portions of the city of Cedar Rapids are furnished under a contract between the city and the Western Street-Light Company, it being charged in the bill that such lamps infringe letters patent Ño. 222.856 and No. 286,211. In the suit brought by the complainant against the Western Street-Light Company it has been decided that the charge of infringement was not made out, and it follows that the complainant has no ground for enjoining the use of these lamps by the city. Ante, 43. The bill is therefore dismissed, at complainant’s costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 F. 47, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 1952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sun-vapor-street-light-co-v-city-of-cedar-rapids-circtnia-1890.