Sun State Ford, Inc. v. Burch

889 So. 2d 778, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 744, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 2175, 2004 WL 2755868
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 2, 2004·No. No. SC04-157·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Burch v. Sun State Ford, Inc., 864 So.2d 466 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), a decision which the district court of appeal certified to be in direct conflict with the decision of another district court pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we have determined that there is no actual conflict and that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction of this cause. [779]*779Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sun State Ford, Inc. v. Burch, 889 So. 2d 778, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 744, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 2175, 2004 WL 2755868 (Fla. 2004).

889 So. 2d 778 (Sun State Ford, Inc. v. Burch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ARTHUR SAGER v. MADALINA BLANCO AND RICARDO F. BLANCO
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022