Sun Seekers Homeowners' Ass'n v. Walton County

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sun Seekers Homeowners' Ass'n v. Walton County

922 So. 2d 1001, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 647, 2006 WL 162751

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 24, 2006

DocketNo. 1D05-1497

StatusPublished

This text of 922 So. 2d 1001 (Sun Seekers Homeowners' Ass'n v. Walton County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sun Seekers Homeowners' Ass'n v. Walton County, 922 So. 2d 1001, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 647, 2006 WL 162751 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Sun Seekers Homeowners’ Association, Inc., appeals a final summary judgment in favor of appellee, Walton County, establishing the public’s right to use an easement for beach access. Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that the easement at issue could be utilized by the general public. Appellee cross-appeals, asserting that the trial court erred in determining that appellant had standing to bring the declaratory judgment action. We agree with the trial court that appellant had standing; however, we reverse the trial court’s determination that appellee had the right to allow the public to use the easement, and we remand with directions to the trial court to enter summary judgment in favor of appellant. See Walters v. McCall, 450 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

BARFIELD, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Sun Seekers Homeowners’ Association, Inc., appeals a final summary judgment in favor of appellee, Walton County, establishing the public’s right to use an easement for beach access. Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that the easement at issue could be utilized by the general public. Appellee cross-appeals, asserting that the trial court erred in determining that appellant had standing to bring the declaratory judgment action. We agree with the trial court that appellant had standing; however, we reverse the trial court’s determination that appellee had the right to allow the public to use the easement, and we remand with directions to the trial court to enter summary judgment in favor of appellant. See Walters v. McCall, 450 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

BARFIELD, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

922 So. 2d 1001, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 647, 2006 WL 162751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sun-seekers-homeowners-assn-v-walton-county-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack