Sun Rubber Co. v. NEW YORK CREDITMEN'S ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC.
106 N.E.2d 54, 303 N.Y. 961
This text of 106 N.E.2d 54 (Sun Rubber Co. v. NEW YORK CREDITMEN'S ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sun Rubber Co. v. NEW YORK CREDITMEN'S ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC., 106 N.E.2d 54, 303 N.Y. 961 (N.Y. 1952).
Opinion
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Sun Rubber Company, Appellant, and New York Creditmen's Adjustment Bureau, Inc., Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Kenneth W. Greenawalt, Martin A. Schenck and John H. Barber for appellant.
George M. Aronwald and Abraham H. Geffner for respondent.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re the Arbitration between Sun Rubber Co. & New York Creditmen's Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
106 N.E.2d 54 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
106 N.E.2d 54, 303 N.Y. 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sun-rubber-co-v-new-york-creditmens-adjustment-bur-ny-1952.