Sun Microsystems v. Microsoft Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Sun Microsystems v. Microsoft Corp.

55 F. App'x 197

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 3, 2003·No. No. 03-1116; Nos. CA-02-2739-JFM, CA-00-1332-MDL·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Appellant has filed motions for stay pending appeal, to expedite appeal, and to file a deferred appendix. Appellee has filed a response in opposition to the motion for stay pending appeal, and a response consenting to the motion to expedite and to file a deferred appendix.

Potential intervenor, WildTangent, Inc., has filed a motion for leave to intervene, consented to by appellant. Appellee filed a response in opposition.

The Court grants the motions for stay, to expedite, and to file a deferred appendix. The Court denies the motion for leave to intervene; however, the papers filed by WildTangent, Inc., will be accepted as a brief amicus curiae.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Appellant has filed motions for stay pending appeal, to expedite appeal, and to file a deferred appendix. Appellee has filed a response in opposition to the motion for stay pending appeal, and a response consenting to the motion to expedite and to file a deferred appendix.

Potential intervenor, WildTangent, Inc., has filed a motion for leave to intervene, consented to by appellant. Appellee filed a response in opposition.

The Court grants the motions for stay, to expedite, and to file a deferred appendix. The Court denies the motion for leave to intervene; however, the papers filed by WildTangent, Inc., will be accepted as a brief amicus curiae.

Sun Microsystems v. Microsoft Corp., 55 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

55 F. App'x 197 (Sun Microsystems v. Microsoft Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.