Sun Life Assurance Co. v. Rivera
242 U.S. 622, 37 S. Ct. 244, 61 L. Ed. 533, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1571
Opinion
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of rule 6, paragraph 5; Nadal v. May, 233 U. S. 447, 454; Cardona v. Quinones, 240 U. S. 83, 88. Mr. Cay Coll Cuchi for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Willis Sweet for the defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sun Life Assurance Co. v. Rivera, 242 U.S. 622, 37 S. Ct. 244, 61 L. Ed. 533, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1571 (1917).
242 U.S. 622 (Sun Life Assurance Co. v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nadal v. May
233 U.S. 447 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Cardona v. Quinones
240 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1916)