Sun Bank of Miami v. National Bank of Florida
376 So. 2d 404, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16035
Opinions
Affirmed. Appellant/plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any equitable or legal basis for relief. See Doing v. Reilly, 176 F.2d 449 (5th Cir. 1949); Maryland Casualty Co. v. Krasnek, 174 So.2d 541 (Fla.1965); Johnson v. Green, 54 So.2d 44 (Fla.1951); Quinn v. Phipps, 93 Fla. 805, 113 So. 419 (1927); Leitner v. Willaford, 306 So.2d 555 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); See also, Chapters 678 and 679, Florida Statutes (1977), and 33 Fla.Jur. Trusts § 61.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sun Bank of Miami v. National Bank of Florida, 376 So. 2d 404, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16035 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).
376 So. 2d 404 (Sun Bank of Miami v. National Bank of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Doing v. Riley
176 F.2d 449 (Fifth Circuit, 1949)
Johnson v. Green
54 So. 2d 44 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)
Maryland Casualty Company v. Krasnek
174 So. 2d 541 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)
Leitner v. Willaford
306 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Casas v. Rosell
359 So. 2d 491 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Saffold Brothers Produce Co.
164 So. 681 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Quinn v. Phipps
113 So. 419 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)