Sun Bank of Miami v. Johnson

380 So. 2d 567, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23622
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 4, 1980·No. No. 79-2274·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Sun Bank of Miami, was the plaintiff below in an action for both compensatory and punitive damages based upon the claim that the defendant-respondent had made false and fraudulent misrepresentations in an application for a corporate loan. In this proceeding, it seeks cer-tiorari review of an order which effectively denied it pre-trial discovery of information concerning the defendant’s personal financial condition, which was pertinent to the punitive damages issue. On the authority of the supreme court’s recent opinion in Tennant v. Charlton, 377 So. 1169 (Fla.1979), which was decided after the trial judge ruled below, we quash the order under review and remand the cause for reconsideration of the issue in the light of that opinion.

Certiorari granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sun Bank of Miami v. Johnson, 380 So. 2d 567, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23622 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

380 So. 2d 567 (Sun Bank of Miami v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Medel v. Republic Nat. Bank of Miami
388 So. 2d 327 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)