Sun Accident Co. v. Bunn

1915 OK 799, 152 P. 370, 51 Okla. 682, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1058
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 12, 1915·No. 5384·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

DEVEREUX, C.

(after stating the facts as above). The only assignment of error argued in the brief of the plaintiffs in error is that the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence. One of the doctors, who attended the assured, testified that she died of inflammation of the stomach and bowels, while another testified that she died of tuberculosis. In this conflict the jury was the proper tribunal to say what was the cause of her death, and as they have found for the plaintiff we will not disturb the verdict. Avants v. Bruner, 39 Okla. 736, 136 Pac. 593; Peters v. Holder, 40 Okla. 93, 136 Pac. 400.

We therefore recommend that the judugment be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sun Accident Co. v. Bunn, 1915 OK 799, 152 P. 370, 51 Okla. 682, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1058 (Okla. 1915).

1915 OK 799 (Sun Accident Co. v. Bunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Town of Watonga v. Morrison
1920 OK 144 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)