Sun Accident Co. v. Bunn

1915 OK 799, 152 P. 370, 51 Okla. 682, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1058
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 12, 1915
Docket5384
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1915 OK 799 (Sun Accident Co. v. Bunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sun Accident Co. v. Bunn, 1915 OK 799, 152 P. 370, 51 Okla. 682, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1058 (Okla. 1915).

Opinion

Opinion by

DEVEREUX, C.

(after stating the facts as above). The only assignment of error argued in the brief of the plaintiffs in error is that the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence. One of the doctors, who attended the assured, testified that she died of inflammation of the stomach and bowels, while another testified that she died of tuberculosis. In this conflict the jury was the proper tribunal to say what was the cause of her death, and as they have found for the plaintiff we will not disturb the verdict. Avants v. Bruner, 39 Okla. 736, 136 Pac. 593; Peters v. Holder, 40 Okla. 93, 136 Pac. 400.

We therefore recommend that the judugment be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Town of Watonga v. Morrison
1920 OK 144 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1915 OK 799, 152 P. 370, 51 Okla. 682, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sun-accident-co-v-bunn-okla-1915.