Sumter County Board of County Commissioners v. Connell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sumter County Board of County Commissioners v. Connell

863 So. 2d 448, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 58, 2004 WL 34508

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 8, 2004

DocketNo. 1D02-4437

StatusPublished

This text of 863 So. 2d 448 (Sumter County Board of County Commissioners v. Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sumter County Board of County Commissioners v. Connell, 863 So. 2d 448, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 58, 2004 WL 34508 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, the employer and servicing agent appeal, and the claimant cross-appeals, from an order awarding temporary partial disability ben[449]*449efits. Because only the issue of whether the claimant was entitled to permanent total disability benefits was framed by the pleadings and tried by the parties, we reverse the award of temporary partial disability benefits. See Florida Power Corp. v. Hamilton, 617 So.2d 333 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). The employer and servicing agent also challenge what they claim was an award of attorney’s fees. However, as the claimant correctly points out, the order neither awards a fee nor states that the employer and servicing agent shall be liable for any fee. Accordingly, this issue is premature. Finally, because it appears that the claim for permanent total disability benefits was mature and ripe for determination, on remand we direct the judge of compensation claims to consider and rule on that claim.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

WEBSTER, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, the employer and servicing agent appeal, and the claimant cross-appeals, from an order awarding temporary partial disability ben[449]*449efits. Because only the issue of whether the claimant was entitled to permanent total disability benefits was framed by the pleadings and tried by the parties, we reverse the award of temporary partial disability benefits. See Florida Power Corp. v. Hamilton, 617 So.2d 333 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). The employer and servicing agent also challenge what they claim was an award of attorney’s fees. However, as the claimant correctly points out, the order neither awards a fee nor states that the employer and servicing agent shall be liable for any fee. Accordingly, this issue is premature. Finally, because it appears that the claim for permanent total disability benefits was mature and ripe for determination, on remand we direct the judge of compensation claims to consider and rule on that claim.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

WEBSTER, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

863 So. 2d 448, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 58, 2004 WL 34508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sumter-county-board-of-county-commissioners-v-connell-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack