Sumrall v. State
Opinion
Ammon Sumrall was convicted of felony murder, three counts of armed robbery, burglary, three counts of aggravated assault, impersonating a public officer, and possession of a firearm during the com[149] mission of a crime.1 He appeals, urging numerous errors. We affirm as to all convictions and sentences except that with respect to burglary, which we vacate.
1. After reviewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the jury’s determination of guilt, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of the crimes for which he was convicted beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).
2. Sumrall contends that the trial court erred in imposing a 20-year sentence for the burglary conviction since this conviction, as the underlying felony in the felony murder conviction, should have merged with the felony murder conviction. We agree. A defendant may not be convicted of felony murder and also be convicted of the underlying felony which was alleged by the indictment to support the felony murder conviction. Zackery v. State, 257 Ga. 442 (360 SE2d 269) (1987).
3. Sumrall’s remaining enumerations of error are without merit.
Judgment affirmed in part and vacated in part.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
442 S.E.2d 246 (Sumrall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.