Sumpter v. Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC (In Re Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC)

468 F. App'x 720
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 16, 2012
Docket10-36066
StatusUnpublished

This text of 468 F. App'x 720 (Sumpter v. Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC (In Re Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sumpter v. Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC (In Re Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC), 468 F. App'x 720 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Robert Sumpter (“Sumpter”) appeals the district court’s order affirming a bankruptcy court’s ruling in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings of Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC and related entities (collectively, “Debtors”). Sumpter challenges the rejection of his resident membership agreement in the Yellowstone Mountain Club, a private ski and golf community in Big Sky, Montana. He contends, under the terms of Debtors’ Second Amended Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”), that Debtors were obligated to assume his agreement.

While it is understandable that Sump-ter would like to have his resident membership agreement assumed, the Plan expressly provided that all executory contracts were deemed rejected except those contracts that were: (1) previously assumed by Debtors pursuant to an order of the bankruptcy court; (2) the subject of a motion to assume filed by Debtors; (3) assumed obligations on the Contract Schedule; or (4) assumed obligations listed in the Member Assumption Schedule. Sumpter’s membership did not fall into any of these four categories. He was given adequate notice of the rejection of the agreement. The bankruptcy court, therefore, did not violate the Plan’s terms when it affirmed Debtors’ rejection. See 11 U.S.C. § 1123(b)(2) (providing that a debtor can assume or reject an executory contract in the bankruptcy plan). That rejection was an appropriate exercise of business judgment because Sumpter’s membership agreement was non-standard, in that it relieved him of any obligation to pay dues in addition to other benefits. See In re Pomona Valley Med. Grp., 476 F.3d 665, 670-71 (9th Cir.2007).

AFFIRMED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Pomona Valley Medical Group, Inc.
476 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 F. App'x 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sumpter-v-yellowstone-mountain-club-llc-in-re-yellowstone-mountain-club-ca9-2012.