Sumner v. Dunkin

Indiana Supreme Court

Sumner v. Dunkin

42 Ind. 530

DecidedMay 15, 1873

StatusPublished

This text of 42 Ind. 530 (Sumner v. Dunkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sumner v. Dunkin, 42 Ind. 530 (Ind. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

Worden, J.

This was an action by the appellants against the appellee. Judgment for the defendant.

S'. Claypool and L, P. Chapin, for appellants. D. R. Eckles and C. C. Matson, for appellee.

We find no assignment of error upon the record for the appellants. There is a cross error assigned by the appellee, but as he has filed no brief, his cross error is regarded as stricken out. See Rule 14.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worden, J.

This was an action by the appellants against the appellee. Judgment for the defendant.

S'. Claypool and L, P. Chapin, for appellants. D. R. Eckles and C. C. Matson, for appellee.

We find no assignment of error upon the record for the appellants. There is a cross error assigned by the appellee, but as he has filed no brief, his cross error is regarded as stricken out. See Rule 14.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 Ind. 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sumner-v-dunkin-ind-1873.