Sumner & Molesworth v. Zimmerman
This text of 420 P.2d 133 (Sumner & Molesworth v. Zimmerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Except that in Sitta v. Zinn, 77 N.M. 146, 420 P.2d 131, decided this day, a writ of mandamus and prohibition was sought, whereás here petitioners seek only a writ of mandamus, the issues and controlling facts presented are identical. The two cases were argued at the same time.
Judge W. T. Scoggin, the original respondent herein, having retired, the Honorable George Zimmerman, Judge of the Third Judicial District, was substituted as respondent in his stead.
For the reasons stated in Sitta v. Zinn, supra, the alternative writ heretofore issued is made permanent.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 P.2d 133, 77 N.M. 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sumner-molesworth-v-zimmerman-nm-1966.