Summit Creditors' Trust v. Hawaii Forest Preservation, LLC (In Re Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities, Co.)

427 B.R. 522, 2010 WL 519831
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii·Decided February 10, 2010·No. 16-00693·Published

Opinion

*524 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF FINANCE FACTORS, LIMITED’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND INTERLOCUTORY DECREE OF FORECLOSURE, AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GBBY EWA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP’S COUNTER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND INTERLOCUTORY DECREE OF FORECLOSURE; EXHIBITS “A-l”— “A-3”

ROBERT J. FARIS, Bankruptcy Judge.

Plaintiff Finance Factors, Limited’s Motion For Summary Judgment and Interlocutory Decree Foreclosure, Filed November 18, 2009 (the “Motion”) and Defendant GBBY Ewa Limited Partnership’s Counter Motion for Summary Judgment and Interlocutory Decree of Foreclosure (“GBBY Motion”), came on for hearing before the Honorable Robert J. Faris on January 8, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. Keith Y. Yamada, Esq. and Theodore D.C. Young, Esq. appeared for Plaintiff Finance Factors, Limited (“Finance Factors”). Malia Kakos, Esq. appeared on behalf of Defendant, Cross-Claimant, and Counterelaimant GBBY Ewa Limited Partnership (“GBBY”). Susan Tius, Esq. and Cheryl Nakamura, Esq. appeared for Defendant Summit Creditors’ Trust (“Summit”). Gary G. Grimmer, Esq. appeared on behalf of D. Buyers Enterprises, LLC (“Buyers”). John Yamano, Esq. appeared on behalf of Ohana Sanctuary, LLC (“Ohana”). Henry F. Beerman, Esq. appeared on behalf of Beverly Ing Lee (“Lee”). No other party appeared at the hearing on the motions.

Based on the evidence, the Court makes the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Finance Factors’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Interlocutory Decree of Foreclosure and Order Granting GBBY’s Counter Motion for Summary Judgment and Interlocutory Decree of Foreclosure.

The Court having determined that the provisions of Rules 7052 and 7056 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, which provides that Rules 52 and 56, of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure applies to these proceedings, have been met, it appearing to the Court that good cause exists, the Court hereby makes the following findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the Mortgages (defined below) and for decree of foreclosure, and Granting GBBY’s Motion on GBBY’s Mortgage (defined below) and for decree of foreclosure.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Finance Factors is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Hawaii.

2. Defendant Summit is a Washington trust with its principal place of business in Spokane, Washington.

3. Defendants Hawaii Forest Preservation, LLC, also known as Hawaii Forest Preservation LLC (“Forest Preservation”), Buyers, Kauilani Ewa, LLC (“Kauilani Ewa”), HHI-L Enterprises, LLC (“HHI-L”); HHI-B Enterprises, LLC (“HHI-B”), and DHI Development, LLC (“DHI”) are Hawaii limited liability companies.

4. Defendant Ohana is a Delaware limited liability company.

5. Defendants Lee, Kyle E. Dong (“Dong”), and Lowell C.E. Ing are and were, at all times relevant herein, residents of the State of Hawaii.

6. Defendant Kauilani Management, Inc. is a Hawaii corporation.

*525 7. Defendant, Cross-Claimant, and Counterclaimant GBBY is a Hawaii limited partnership.

8. Defendants John Does 1-50, Jane Does 1-50, Doe Partnerships 1-50, Doe Corporations 1-50, Doe Entities 1-50 and Doe Governmental Units 1-50 are persons or entities who have or may have lien rights or other interests in the mortgaged properties, but their names, identities and capacities are not presently known to Finance Factors and its attorneys.

9. Defendant Lee is fee simple owner of those certain properties located at TMK Nos. (3) 2-7-001-001 and (3) 2-8-001-002, a true and correct copy of the legal descriptions are attached hereto as Exhibit “A-l” (the “Forest Preservation Properties”).

10. Defendant Kauilani Ewa is the fee simple owner of those certain properties located at TMK Nos. (1) 9-1-037-146, - 150, -152, -153, and Defendant Beverly Lee is the fee simple owner of those certain properties located at TMK Nos. (1) 9-1-037-151, -154, -156, -159, -160, -161, - 162, -163, -164, -165, -166, -167, -168, - 169, -170, -171, -172, -173, -174, -175, a true and correct copy of the legal descriptions are attached hereto as Exhibit “A-2” (collectively, the “Kauilani Ewa Properties”) (collectively, the Forest Preservation Properties and the Kauilani Ewa Properties are referred to as the “Mortgaged Properties”).

11. Defendant Lee is the fee simple owner of that certain property located at TMK No. (1) 4-3-008-024, a true and correct copy of the legal description is attached hereto as Exhibit “A-3” (the “Lani-kai Lot”). The Lanikai Lot shall not be considered to be part of the Mortgage Properties as defined hereinabove because Defendant Lee has raised a genuine issue of material fact as to the validity of the Lanikai Lot Mortgage (as defined below).

Forest Preservation Properties

12. On June 30, 2005, Summit Securities, Inc. (“Summit Securities”), Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities Co., Inc. (“Metropolitan”), Finance Factors and Forest Preservation entered into that certain In-tercreditor and Subordination Agreement (the “Intercreditor Agreement”), whereby the parties agreed that Finance Factors would loan money to Forest Preservation, that Forest Preservation would grant a first and third mortgage to Finance Factors, and Summit Securities and Metropolitan would subordinate their mortgage (recorded in the Bureau of Conveyances of the State of Hawaii (the “Bureau”) as Document No. 2000-104969) to the second mortgage position after the Forest Preservation First Mortgage (defined below) and before the Forest Preservation Third Mortgage (defined below).

13. On June 30, 2005, Forest Preservation, Summit Securities and Finance Factors executed that certain Subordination of Mortgage and Security Instruments (the “Subordination”), recorded in the Bureau as Document No. 2005-133399, whereby Summit Securities subordinated its mortgage made by Forest Preservation and recorded as Document No. 2000-104969.

14. Summit Securities assigned its note and loan documents to Defendant Summit by that certain Assignment of Loan Documents effective April 25, 2006, acknowledged on June 12, 2008, recorded in the Bureau as Document No. 2009-035233, and Defendant Summit is now the mortgagee in the second mortgage position after the Forest Preservation First Mortgage (defined below) and before the Forest Preservation Third Mortgage (defined below).

15. On June 30, 2005, Kauilani Ewa, Forest Preservation and Dong for value received, executed a Promissory Note for the principal amount of $5,850,000.00 in *526 favor of Finance Factors, which was to mature on July 1, 2006 (“Note 1”).

16.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summit Creditors' Trust v. Hawaii Forest Preservation, LLC (In Re Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities, Co.), 427 B.R. 522, 2010 WL 519831 (Haw. 2010).

427 B.R. 522 (Summit Creditors' Trust v. Hawaii Forest Preservation, LLC (In Re Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities, Co.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ranier v. Mount Sterling National Bank
812 S.W.2d 154 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1991)