Summit Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Speciality Insurance

633 F. App'x 785
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMarch 7, 2016
DocketNo. 15-11051
StatusPublished

This text of 633 F. App'x 785 (Summit Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Speciality Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Summit Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Speciality Insurance, 633 F. App'x 785 (11th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Summit Contractors, Inc. (“Summit”) appeals summary judgment granted to Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company (“Crum & Forster”) in its action under a general liability insurance policy seeking a determination of the applicability of the Self-Insured Retention Endorsement in the policy issued by Crum & Forster. After studying the briefs, reviewing the record, and hearing oral argument in this case, we affirm the judgment of-the district court granting summary judgment to Crum & Forster and denying summary judgment to Summit for the reasons set forth in its Order, .dated February 12, 2015.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 F. App'x 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summit-contractors-inc-v-crum-forster-speciality-insurance-ca11-2016.