Summerville v. Warden
617 A.2d 172, 224 Conn. 918, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 415
Opinion
The respondent warden’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 162 (AC 10114), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court have proper grounds for remanding this case to the habeas court for a consideration of expert testimony that was not presented at the petitioner’s criminal trial?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Summerville v. Warden, 617 A.2d 172, 224 Conn. 918, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 415 (Colo. 1992).
617 A.2d 172 (Summerville v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Summerville v. Warden, State Prison
641 A.2d 1356 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)