Summerville v. State

125 S.E. 208, 33 Ga. App. 42, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 699
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 12, 1924
Docket15760
StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.E. 208 (Summerville v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Summerville v. State, 125 S.E. 208, 33 Ga. App. 42, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 699 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 208, 33 Ga. App. 42, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summerville-v-state-gactapp-1924.