Summerville v. State

441 So. 2d 1072, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3226
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 13, 1983·No. No. 61761·Published

Opinions

EHRLICH, Justice.

Petitioner seeks review of a denial of habeas corpus. Summerville v. State, 408 So.2d 836 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution, based on conflict between the First District Court of Appeal, Carson v. Bishop, 378 So.2d 882 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), and the Fourth Dis[1073]*1073trict, State v. Sylvester, 401 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

This case presents us with the same issue as Miller v. Toles, 442 So.2d 177 (Fla.1983), which issued today. For the reasons set forth in Miller, we grant the writ of habeas corpus and quash the opinion of the court below.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON and SHAW, JJ., concur. ALDERMAN, C.J., dissents with an opinion, in which McDONALD, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summerville v. State, 441 So. 2d 1072, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3226 (Fla. 1983).

441 So. 2d 1072 (Summerville v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Toles
442 So. 2d 177 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
State v. Sylvester
401 So. 2d 1123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Carson v. Bishop
378 So. 2d 882 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Summerville v. State
408 So. 2d 836 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)