Summersill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Summersill v. State

281 So. 2d 58

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 8, 1973

DocketNo. 72-453

StatusPublished

This text of 281 So. 2d 58 (Summersill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Summersill v. State, 281 So. 2d 58 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before this court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment which comes to this court clothed with presumption of correctness is hereby affirmed. See, Chaney v. State, Fla.1972, 267 So.2d 65.

LILES, J., and PIERCE, J. (Ret.), concur. MANN, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before this court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment which comes to this court clothed with presumption of correctness is hereby affirmed. See, Chaney v. State, Fla.1972, 267 So.2d 65.

LILES, J., and PIERCE, J. (Ret.), concur. MANN, C. J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 So. 2d 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summersill-v-state-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack