Summersill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Summersill v. State

281 So. 2d 58

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 8, 1973·No. No. 72-453·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before this court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment which comes to this court clothed with presumption of correctness is hereby affirmed. See, Chaney v. State, Fla.1972, 267 So.2d 65.

LILES, J., and PIERCE, J. (Ret.), concur. MANN, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before this court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment which comes to this court clothed with presumption of correctness is hereby affirmed. See, Chaney v. State, Fla.1972, 267 So.2d 65.

LILES, J., and PIERCE, J. (Ret.), concur. MANN, C. J., dissents.

Summersill v. State, 281 So. 2d 58 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

281 So. 2d 58 (Summersill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related