Summers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Summers v. State

509 S.W.3d 756, 2017 WL 487001, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 59

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 7, 2017

DocketWD 79213

StatusPublished

This text of 509 S.W.3d 756 (Summers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Summers v. State, 509 S.W.3d 756, 2017 WL 487001, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 59 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

[757]*757ORDER

Per Curiam:

Jay A. Summers appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief contending that he pled guilty as a result of ineffective assistance of counsel because his plea attorney failed to investigate the value of the property that Summers was alleged to have stolen, and an investigation would have shown that Summers did not commit a felony because the value of the property was under $500 and, had Summers known this, he would have insisted on a trial rather than pleading guilty. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[757]*757ORDER

Per Curiam:

Jay A. Summers appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief contending that he pled guilty as a result of ineffective assistance of counsel because his plea attorney failed to investigate the value of the property that Summers was alleged to have stolen, and an investigation would have shown that Summers did not commit a felony because the value of the property was under $500 and, had Summers known this, he would have insisted on a trial rather than pleading guilty. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

509 S.W.3d 756, 2017 WL 487001, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summers-v-state-moctapp-2017.