Summers v. State

695 So. 2d 893, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6953, 1997 WL 336954
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 20, 1997
DocketNo. 97-1007
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 695 So. 2d 893 (Summers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Summers v. State, 695 So. 2d 893, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6953, 1997 WL 336954 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

W. SHARP, Judge.

Summers appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, in which he sought to collaterally attack his conviction for second degree murder. He filed his motion on April 3, 1997, and the trial court denied it on April 7, 1997. The trial court thought it lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion because Summers had appealed the criminal conviction and the appeal was still pending. We reverse.

On March 20, 1997, in an unpublished order, this court dismissed Summer’s criminal appeal in response to the public defender’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed on March 18, 1997. Summers v. State, No. 96-3616 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 20, 1997). No mandate was issued, but a notice of the dismissal was mailed to the trial court on April 7, 1997, by coincidence, the same day it dismissed Summer’s 3.850 motion. Unlike E-Mail or facsimile, the U.S. mail is not nearly instantaneous, although it is the mode we rely upon to communicate on official business. Thus, through no fault of its own, the trial court was not aware of the dismissal of the appeal before it ruled.

Since the criminal appeal was dismissed on March 20, 1997, the trial judge had jurisdiction to consider Summer’s 3.850 motion on the merits at the time Summers filed the motion on April 3,1997, as well as at the time the trial court dismissed the motion on April 7, 1997. Accordingly, we reverse and remand so that the trial court can address Summer’s 3.850 claims on the merits. See, e.g., Reed v. State, 610 So.2d 736 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bynum v. State
784 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
695 So. 2d 893, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6953, 1997 WL 336954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summers-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.