Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Summers v. State

Summers v. State

771 S.W.2d 16, 298 Ark. 605, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 227
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMay 8, 1989
DocketRC 89-16
StatusPublished

This text of 771 S.W.2d 16 (Summers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Summers v. State, 771 S.W.2d 16, 298 Ark. 605, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 227 (Ark. 1989).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Charles Summers, by his attorney, Lynn F. Plemmons, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to miscalculation of the ninety-day limit for filing the record in this Court. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(a).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See per curiam dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964; Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
771 S.W.2d 16, 298 Ark. 605, 1989 Ark. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summers-v-state-ark-1989.