Summers v. McCoy

Sixth Circuit

Summers v. McCoy

163 F.2d 1021

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 21, 1947

DocketNo. 10477

StatusPublished

This text of 163 F.2d 1021 (Summers v. McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Summers v. McCoy, 163 F.2d 1021 (6th Cir. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal having been considered by the Court on the record, arguments of counsel and respective briefs; and it appearing that the order of the Postmaster General, of which the appellant complains, was fairly arrived at, has substantial evidence to support it and is not palpably wrong or arbitrary; it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed. Leach v. Carlile, 258 U.S. 138, 42 S.Ct. 227, 66 L.Ed. 511; Farley v. Hein-inger, 70 App.D.C. 200, 105 F.2d 79.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal having been considered by the Court on the record, arguments of counsel and respective briefs; and it appearing that the order of the Postmaster General, of which the appellant complains, was fairly arrived at, has substantial evidence to support it and is not palpably wrong or arbitrary; it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed. Leach v. Carlile, 258 U.S. 138, 42 S.Ct. 227, 66 L.Ed. 511; Farley v. Hein-inger, 70 App.D.C. 200, 105 F.2d 79.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 F.2d 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summers-v-mccoy-ca6-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack