Summers v. McCoy

Sixth Circuit

Summers v. McCoy

163 F.2d 1021

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 21, 1947·No. No. 10477·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal having been considered by the Court on the record, arguments of counsel and respective briefs; and it appearing that the order of the Postmaster General, of which the appellant complains, was fairly arrived at, has substantial evidence to support it and is not palpably wrong or arbitrary; it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed. Leach v. Carlile, 258 U.S. 138, 42 S.Ct. 227, 66 L.Ed. 511; Farley v. Hein-inger, 70 App.D.C. 200, 105 F.2d 79.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal having been considered by the Court on the record, arguments of counsel and respective briefs; and it appearing that the order of the Postmaster General, of which the appellant complains, was fairly arrived at, has substantial evidence to support it and is not palpably wrong or arbitrary; it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed. Leach v. Carlile, 258 U.S. 138, 42 S.Ct. 227, 66 L.Ed. 511; Farley v. Hein-inger, 70 App.D.C. 200, 105 F.2d 79.

Summers v. McCoy, 163 F.2d 1021 (6th Cir. 1947).

Pincite

163 F.2d 1021 (Summers v. McCoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related