Summers v. Lipscomb

101 S.W.2d 375
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 27, 1937·No. No. 9954·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MURRAY, Justice.

This cause has been regularly submitted in this court, but neither plaintiff in error nor defendant in error has filed written briefs, as required by article 1848, R.C.S. 1925, as amended (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 1848), and Rules 22 and 38 for Courts of Civil Appeals.

Such failure to file briefs requires that the appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution. Rule 38, supra.

Accordingly, the appeal will be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summers v. Lipscomb, 101 S.W.2d 375 (Tex. Ct. App. 1937).

101 S.W.2d 375 (Summers v. Lipscomb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Graves v. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co.
104 S.W.2d 121 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)