Summers v. Lipscomb

Court of Appeals of Texas

Summers v. Lipscomb

101 S.W.2d 375

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 27, 1937

DocketNo. 9954

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 S.W.2d 375 (Summers v. Lipscomb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Summers v. Lipscomb, 101 S.W.2d 375 (Tex. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

MURRAY, Justice.

This cause has been regularly submitted in this court, but neither plaintiff in error nor defendant in error has filed written briefs, as required by article 1848, R.C.S. 1925, as amended (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 1848), and Rules 22 and 38 for Courts of Civil Appeals.

Such failure to file briefs requires that the appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution. Rule 38, supra.

Accordingly, the appeal will be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MURRAY, Justice.

This cause has been regularly submitted in this court, but neither plaintiff in error nor defendant in error has filed written briefs, as required by article 1848, R.C.S. 1925, as amended (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 1848), and Rules 22 and 38 for Courts of Civil Appeals.

Such failure to file briefs requires that the appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution. Rule 38, supra.

Accordingly, the appeal will be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 S.W.2d 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summers-v-lipscomb-texapp-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack