Summers v. Houston

1917 OK 121, 162 P. 1097, 62 Okla. 282, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 297
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Summers v. Houston. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 Okla. 280
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 30, 1917·No. 7761·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, C.

On appeal to this court from a judgment of the district court of Bryan county a supersedeas bond was filed, executed by the plaintiffs in error, Dave Summers and J. A. Alderson, as principals, and J. J. Gibson and H. H. Chaffin, as sureties, to stay said judgment.

On the 21st day of July, A. D. 1915, there was judgment of this court against the ap *283 pellants; and motion has been filed herein for judgment against the sureties on such supersedeas bona. By virtue of the provisions of chapter 249, Session Laws 1915, as construed in Long v. Lang, 49 Okla. 342, 152 Pac. 1078, the motion is sustained.

Judgment is therefore entered in this court against J. J. Gibson and H. H. Chaffin, as sureties, in the sum of $758.50, together with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from the 21st day of July, 1915, until paid, and all costs of the action.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summers v. Houston, 1917 OK 121, 162 P. 1097, 62 Okla. 282, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 297 (Okla. 1917).

1917 OK 121 (Summers v. Houston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Long v. O. R. Lang & Co.
1915 OK 886 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)