Summers v. Houston
This text of 1917 OK 121 (Summers v. Houston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
On appeal to this court from a judgment of the district court of Bryan county a supersedeas bond was filed, executed by the plaintiffs in error, Dave Summers and J. A. Alderson, as principals, and J. J. Gibson and H. H. Chaffin, as sureties, to stay said judgment.
On the 21st day of July, A. D. 1915, there was judgment of this court against the ap *283 pellants; and motion has been filed herein for judgment against the sureties on such supersedeas bona. By virtue of the provisions of chapter 249, Session Laws 1915, as construed in Long v. Lang, 49 Okla. 342, 152 Pac. 1078, the motion is sustained.
Judgment is therefore entered in this court against J. J. Gibson and H. H. Chaffin, as sureties, in the sum of $758.50, together with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from the 21st day of July, 1915, until paid, and all costs of the action.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1917 OK 121, 162 P. 1097, 62 Okla. 282, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summers-v-houston-okla-1917.