Summers v. Clark
This text of 162 P. 1097 (Summers v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
On appeal to this court from a judgment of the district court of Bryan county a supersedeas bond was.filed, executed by the plaintiffs in error, Dave Summers and J. A. Alderson, as principals, and J. J. Gibson and H. H. Chaffin, as sureties, to stay said judgment.
On the 21st day of July, 1915, there was judgment of this court against the appellants ; and motion has been filed herein for judgment agdinst the sureties on such super-sedeas bond. By virtue of the provisions of chapter 249, Session Laws 1915, as construed in Long v. Lang, 49 Okla. 342, 152 Pac 1078, the motion is sustained.
Judgment is therefore entered in this court against J. J. Gibson and H. H. Chaffin in the sum of $300, together with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from the 21st day of July, 1915, until paid, and all costs of the action.
¡By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 P. 1097, 62 Okla. 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summers-v-clark-okla-1917.