Summers v. Christian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Summers v. Christian

60 A.D.2d 632, 400 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14616

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 19, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.2d 632 (Summers v. Christian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Summers v. Christian, 60 A.D.2d 632, 400 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia,, to review a determination of the New York City Housing Authority which, after a hearing, terminated petitioner-appellant’s tenancy on the ground of nondesirability, petitioner appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 16, 1977, as denied the application to annul the determination. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and determination annulled. The determination was unsupported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. There is no evidence that the fires were intentionally caused by petitioner or any members of her family. Nor is there any evidence that petitioner was negligent or that the fires occurred as a result of negligence. Accordingly, the determination must be annulled. Hopkins, J. P., Margett, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia,, to review a determination of the New York City Housing Authority which, after a hearing, terminated petitioner-appellant’s tenancy on the ground of nondesirability, petitioner appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 16, 1977, as denied the application to annul the determination. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and determination annulled. The determination was unsupported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. There is no evidence that the fires were intentionally caused by petitioner or any members of her family. Nor is there any evidence that petitioner was negligent or that the fires occurred as a result of negligence. Accordingly, the determination must be annulled. Hopkins, J. P., Margett, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 632, 400 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summers-v-christian-nyappdiv-1977.