Summerlin v. State

673 So. 2d 558, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5438, 1996 WL 263410
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 20, 1996·No. No. 95-3573·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, an inmate in the state correctional system, seeks review of an order denying his motion, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, seeking post-conviction relief. The trial court denied the motion on the merits. “[W]hen the denial is not predicated on the legal insufficiency of the motion on its face, a copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that the prisoner is entitled to no relief shall be attached to the order.” Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.850(d). Because no portion of the record is attached to the trial court’s order, we reverse, and remand with directions that the trial court either attach that portion of the record which conclusively shows that appellant is entitled to no relief, or take other appropriate action, as contemplated by rule 3.850(d).

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summerlin v. State, 673 So. 2d 558, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5438, 1996 WL 263410 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

673 So. 2d 558 (Summerlin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. CLAIMS PREVENTON & MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
673 So. 2d 558 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)