Summerlin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Summerlin v. State

673 So. 2d 558, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5438, 1996 WL 263410

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 20, 1996

DocketNo. 95-3573

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 673 So. 2d 558 (Summerlin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Summerlin v. State, 673 So. 2d 558, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5438, 1996 WL 263410 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, an inmate in the state correctional system, seeks review of an order denying his motion, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, seeking post-conviction relief. The trial court denied the motion on the merits. “[W]hen the denial is not predicated on the legal insufficiency of the motion on its face, a copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that the prisoner is entitled to no relief shall be attached to the order.” Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.850(d). Because no portion of the record is attached to the trial court’s order, we reverse, and remand with directions that the trial court either attach that portion of the record which conclusively shows that appellant is entitled to no relief, or take other appropriate action, as contemplated by rule 3.850(d).

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, an inmate in the state correctional system, seeks review of an order denying his motion, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, seeking post-conviction relief. The trial court denied the motion on the merits. “[W]hen the denial is not predicated on the legal insufficiency of the motion on its face, a copy of that portion of the files and records that conclusively shows that the prisoner is entitled to no relief shall be attached to the order.” Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.850(d). Because no portion of the record is attached to the trial court’s order, we reverse, and remand with directions that the trial court either attach that portion of the record which conclusively shows that appellant is entitled to no relief, or take other appropriate action, as contemplated by rule 3.850(d).

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

MINER, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

673 So. 2d 558, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5438, 1996 WL 263410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summerlin-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack