Summerlin Asset Management V. Trust v. Oyenuga

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedMay 17, 2022
Docket1:15-cv-00769
StatusUnknown

This text of Summerlin Asset Management V. Trust v. Oyenuga (Summerlin Asset Management V. Trust v. Oyenuga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Summerlin Asset Management V. Trust v. Oyenuga, (E.D.N.Y. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------- X : SUMMERLIN ASSET MANAGEMENT V. TRUST, : Plaintiff, : MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

: 15-CV-769 (AMD) (RML) – against – :

MODUPE OYENUGA, et al., : : Defendants.

--------------------------------------------------------------- X

ANN M. DONNELLY, United States District Judge:

On February 13, 2015, the plaintiff commenced this foreclosure action relating to a

property located at 102-09 216th Street in Queens Vil lage, New York (the “Property”). (ECF No. 1.) The defendants did not respond, and the Clerk of Court entered certificates of default

against them. (ECF Nos. 14, 19.) On August 17, 2016, the plaintiff moved for default judgment

(ECF No. 19), and I referred the motion to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy for a Report and

Recommendation. Judge Levy issued a Report and Recommendation on February 14, 2017, recommending that I grant the plaintiff’s motion, order the foreclosure and sale of the Property, appoint a referee, and enter a judgment against the defendant Modupe Oyenuga in the amount of $593,420.24. (ECF No. 23.) I adopted Judge Levy’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety on March 20, 2017, and then entered a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the Property and appointed a referee. (ECF Nos. 25, 30, 38.) Avail 1 LLC (“Avail”) purchased the property at auction on February 15, 2019 (ECF No. 40), and this case was closed. On January 31, 2022, Avail appeared in this action and filed a motion for a writ of assistance. (ECF No. 42-1 at 3.) Avail states that the defendants Oyenuga and Michael Ilonze refuse to vacate the Property. Avail seeks an order joining it as a party plaintiff and “granting a Writ of Assistance and delivering possession of the Property to and in favor of Avail and against Defendants.” (Id.) I referred the motion to Judge Levy for a Report and Recommendation. On April 20, 2022, Judge Levy issued a Report and Recommendation in which he

recommended that the motion be denied. (ECF No. 45.) Judge Levy highlighted that Avail “cites no authority, and the court is aware of none, allowing a non-party purchaser to join a foreclosure case after final judgment and move for a writ of assistance evicting the previous owners.” (Id. at 2.) He noted that “Avail’s remedy seems to properly lie in New York State court, where N.Y. Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law (‘RPAPL’) § 221 permits a grant of a writ of assistance to a non-party purchaser of a foreclosed property at the court’s discretion.” (Id. at 4.) No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). To accept those

portions of the report and recommendation to which no timely objection has been made, “a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Jarvis v. N. Am. Globex Fund L.P., 823 F. Supp. 2d 161, 163 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) (quoting Wilds v. United Parcel Serv., 262 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)). I have reviewed Judge Levy’s comprehensive and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation and find no error. Accordingly, I adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The motion for a writ of assistance is denied.

SO ORDERED. s/Ann M. Donnelly ___________________________ ANN M. DONNELLY United States District Judge Dated: Brooklyn, New York May 16, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jarvis v. North American Globex Fund, L.P.
823 F. Supp. 2d 161 (E.D. New York, 2011)
Wilds v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
262 F. Supp. 2d 163 (S.D. New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Summerlin Asset Management V. Trust v. Oyenuga, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summerlin-asset-management-v-trust-v-oyenuga-nyed-2022.