Summerill v. Summerill

93 A. 727, 83 N.J. Eq. 350, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 403
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 8, 1914·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by the chancellor.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenohard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Yredenburgh, White, Heppenjleimer — 9.,

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summerill v. Summerill, 93 A. 727, 83 N.J. Eq. 350, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 403 (N.J. 1914).

93 A. 727 (Summerill v. Summerill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blut v. Katz
81 A.2d 406 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Bell v. Merchants B. L. Assn.
28 A.2d 295 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)
Fellman v. Henderson B. L. Assn.
185 A. 495 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)