Summerhalder v. Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Summerhalder v. Oregon State Penitentiary

753 P.2d 958, 91 Or. App. 170

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 11, 1988

Docket07-87-309; CA A45469

StatusPublished

This text of 753 P.2d 958 (Summerhalder v. Oregon State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Summerhalder v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 753 P.2d 958, 91 Or. App. 170 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary which found him guilty of a disciplinary rule and imposed a $100 fine. He argues that there is not sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty. There is. He also contends that the fine is unlawful. It is. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary which found him guilty of a disciplinary rule and imposed a $100 fine. He argues that there is not sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty. There is. He also contends that the fine is unlawful. It is. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).

Fine vacated; order otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

753 P.2d 958, 91 Or. App. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summerhalder-v-oregon-state-penitentiary-orctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack