Summerford v. Evans

149 So. 923, 227 Ala. 701
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedOctober 5, 1933
Docket8 Div. 519.
StatusPublished

This text of 149 So. 923 (Summerford v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Summerford v. Evans, 149 So. 923, 227 Ala. 701 (Ala. 1933).

Opinion

BOULDIN, Justice.

The charges refused to defendant, so far as not erroneous or misleading, were fully covered by the oral charge of the court.

No other question being presented, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 So. 923, 227 Ala. 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summerford-v-evans-ala-1933.