Summerford v. Evans

149 So. 923, 227 Ala. 701
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided October 5, 1933·No. 8 Div. 519.·Published

Opinion

BOULDIN, Justice.

The charges refused to defendant, so far as not erroneous or misleading, were fully covered by the oral charge of the court.

No other question being presented, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summerford v. Evans, 149 So. 923, 227 Ala. 701 (Ala. 1933).

149 So. 923 (Summerford v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.