Summerall v. State
This text of 880 So. 2d 714 (Summerall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert F. Summerall challenges his designation as a sexual predator under the Florida Sexual Predators Act (“the Act”), section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2003). He argues that the Act is unconstitutional as a violation of procedural due process. We affirm. See Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). In so doing, we certify conflict with the Third District’s opinion in Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
880 So. 2d 714, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6238, 2004 WL 947841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summerall-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.