Summerall v. State

880 So. 2d 714, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6238, 2004 WL 947841
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 5, 2004
DocketNo. 2D03-3777
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 880 So. 2d 714 (Summerall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Summerall v. State, 880 So. 2d 714, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6238, 2004 WL 947841 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

Robert F. Summerall challenges his designation as a sexual predator under the Florida Sexual Predators Act (“the Act”), section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2003). He argues that the Act is unconstitutional as a violation of procedural due process. We affirm. See Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). In so doing, we certify conflict with the Third District’s opinion in Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

Affirmed; conflict certified.

NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manuel v. DCFS
880 So. 2d 714 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
880 So. 2d 714, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6238, 2004 WL 947841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/summerall-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.