Summerall v. Dixon

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 2024·No. 2023-3365·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2023-3365

RICHARD G. SUMMERALL,

Petitioner,

v.

RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.,

Respondents.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

June 26, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

Appellant is warned that any future filings that this court determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this Court and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2023) (providing that “[a] prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous or malicious suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal” is subject to disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections).

ROWE, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Richard G. Summerall, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summerall v. Dixon, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Summerall v. Dixon (Summerall v. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)