SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT, INC. v. Camacho

Court of Appeals of Texas

SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT, INC. v. Camacho

224 S.W.3d 270, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5065, 2005 WL 1536337

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 30, 2005·No. 08-05-00156-CV·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Pending before the Court is Appellants motion to dismiss this appeal. In the motion, Appellant represents to this Court that the parties have now resolved all matters in dispute in the underlying lawsuit. Further, Appellant requests that this appeal be dismissed in all respects with each party to bear its own allocation of costs on appeal. Appellants counsel has conferred with Appellees counsel on their agreed settlement.

We have considered this cause on this motion and conclude that the motion should be granted. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(1). We therefore dismiss the appeal with each party to bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Pending before the Court is Appellants motion to dismiss this appeal. In the motion, Appellant represents to this Court that the parties have now resolved all matters in dispute in the underlying lawsuit. Further, Appellant requests that this appeal be dismissed in all respects with each party to bear its own allocation of costs on appeal. Appellants counsel has conferred with Appellees counsel on their agreed settlement.

We have considered this cause on this motion and conclude that the motion should be granted. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(1). We therefore dismiss the appeal with each party to bear its own costs.

SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT, INC. v. Camacho, 224 S.W.3d 270, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5065, 2005 WL 1536337 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

224 S.W.3d 270 (SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT, INC. v. Camacho) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related