SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT, INC. v. Camacho

224 S.W.3d 270, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5065, 2005 WL 1536337
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 30, 2005
Docket08-05-00156-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 224 S.W.3d 270 (SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT, INC. v. Camacho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT, INC. v. Camacho, 224 S.W.3d 270, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5065, 2005 WL 1536337 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Pending before the Court is Appellants motion to dismiss this appeal. In the motion, Appellant represents to this Court that the parties have now resolved all matters in dispute in the underlying lawsuit. Further, Appellant requests that this appeal be dismissed in all respects with each party to bear its own allocation of costs on appeal. Appellants counsel has conferred with Appellees counsel on their agreed settlement.

We have considered this cause on this motion and conclude that the motion should be granted. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(a)(1). We therefore dismiss the appeal with each party to bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith and Marrs, Inc. v. Dk Boyd Land and Cattle, Co.
224 S.W.3d 270 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 S.W.3d 270, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5065, 2005 WL 1536337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sumitomo-marine-management-inc-v-camacho-texapp-2005.