Sumbry v. Gary City Police
This text of Sumbry v. Gary City Police (Sumbry v. Gary City Police) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 23, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30242 Conference Calendar
LARRIANTE SUMBRY,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
GARY CITY POLICE; CECIL DAVIS,
Respondents-Appellees.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:05-CV-75 --------------------
Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Larriante Sumbry, Indiana prisoner # 965137, appeals the
denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition which the district court
construed as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and dismissed for
lack of jurisdiction. Sumbry does not set forth argument citing
to the record and fails to identify error in the district court’s
determinations and conclusions. When an appellant fails to
identify error in the district court’s decision, it is as if the
appellant had not appealed that judgment. See Brinkmann v.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 05-30242 -2-
Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.
1987). Sumbry’s appeal is therefore DISMISSED as frivolous. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2; Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.
1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sumbry v. Gary City Police, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sumbry-v-gary-city-police-ca5-2006.