Sulzer Orthopedics Inc. v. Helen I. Rupp and Bernard Rupp, Naomi B. Bonorden, Lillian Sallinger and Carl Sallinger

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 7, 2009
Docket13-01-00844-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Sulzer Orthopedics Inc. v. Helen I. Rupp and Bernard Rupp, Naomi B. Bonorden, Lillian Sallinger and Carl Sallinger (Sulzer Orthopedics Inc. v. Helen I. Rupp and Bernard Rupp, Naomi B. Bonorden, Lillian Sallinger and Carl Sallinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sulzer Orthopedics Inc. v. Helen I. Rupp and Bernard Rupp, Naomi B. Bonorden, Lillian Sallinger and Carl Sallinger, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-01-00844-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

SULZER ORTHOPEDICS INC., Appellant,



v.



HELEN I. RUPP AND BERNARD RUPP,

NAOMI B. BONORDEN, LILLIAN SALLINGER

AND CARL SALLINGER, Appellees.

_____________________________________________________________



On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Nueces County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



This case is before the Court on a joint motion to vacate the trial court's judgment and render judgment of dismissal. The parties have reached an agreement with regard to the disposition of the matters currently on appeal. Pursuant to agreement, the parties request this Court to vacate the trial court's judgment and render judgment dismissing all claims with prejudice and tax any costs against the party that incurred it.

The joint motion to vacate and render judgment dismissing all claims with prejudice is GRANTED. Accordingly, we vacate the trial court's judgment and DISMISS the case. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d). The parties' request to expedite the mandate is GRANTED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 7th day of May, 2009.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sulzer Orthopedics Inc. v. Helen I. Rupp and Bernard Rupp, Naomi B. Bonorden, Lillian Sallinger and Carl Sallinger, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sulzer-orthopedics-inc-v-helen-i-rupp-and-bernard--texapp-2009.