Sulzbacker v. J. Cawthra & Co.
70 N.Y. St. Rep. 895
This text of 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 895 (Sulzbacker v. J. Cawthra & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sulzbacker v. J. Cawthra & Co., 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 895 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
Defendant’s motion to reduce the amount for which the attachment was granted is not inconsistent with its appeal from the order denying the motion to vacate the attachment. Both motions were availed of by the defendant as of right. Hence this motion for dismissal of the appeal should be denied, with §10 costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
70 N.Y. St. Rep. 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sulzbacker-v-j-cawthra-co-nynyccityct-1895.