Sulzbacker v. J. Cawthra & Co.
35 N.Y.S. 1118, 14 Misc. 544
Opinion
Defendant’s motion to reduce the amount for which the attachment was granted is not inconsistent with its appeal from the order denying the motion to vacate the attachment Both motions were availed of by the defendant as of right Hence this motion for dismissal of the appeal should be denied, with $10 costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sulzbacker v. J. Cawthra & Co., 35 N.Y.S. 1118, 14 Misc. 544 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
35 N.Y.S. 1118 (Sulzbacker v. J. Cawthra & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brandley v. American Butter Co.
60 Misc. 547 (New York Supreme Court, 1908)