Sultzer & Chambre, Inc. v. Inter-Continental Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sultzer & Chambre, Inc. v. Inter-Continental Construction Corp.

188 A.D. 955

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1919·Published

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten doEars costs and disbursements, on the ground that the order fads to recite the grounds for an injunction (Code Civ. Proc. § 610; Meyer v. Moress, 106 App. Div. 556; Brockway v. Miller, 144 id. 239; Burdi v. Giordano, 158 id. 945), and the proceedings remitted to the Special Term for further action upon the motion for an injunction on such additional papers as may be submitted on notice. [956] Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.; Clarke, P. J., voted for reversal and denial of motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten doEars costs and disbursements, on the ground that the order fads to recite the grounds for an injunction (Code Civ. Proc. § 610; Meyer v. Moress, 106 App. Div. 556; Brockway v. Miller, 144 id. 239; Burdi v. Giordano, 158 id. 945), and the proceedings remitted to the Special Term for further action upon the motion for an injunction on such additional papers as may be submitted on notice. [956] Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ.; Clarke, P. J., voted for reversal and denial of motion.

Sultzer & Chambre, Inc. v. Inter-Continental Construction Corp., 188 A.D. 955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

188 A.D. 955 (Sultzer & Chambre, Inc. v. Inter-Continental Construction Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related