Sultan v. Lamport Co.
18 A.D.2d 889, 237 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4390
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 11, 1963·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Order entered on February 28, 1962, dismissing, on the merits, the first cause of action in the amended complaint, and the judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.; Rabin, J., concurs for affirmance solely on the ground that the Statute of Frauds precludes recovery on the first cause of action. [34 Misc 2d 763.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sultan v. Lamport Co., 18 A.D.2d 889, 237 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).
18 A.D.2d 889 (Sultan v. Lamport Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flickinger v. Harold C. Brown & Co., Inc.
789 F. Supp. 616 (W.D. New York, 1992)
Caballero v. Anselmo
759 F. Supp. 144 (S.D. New York, 1991)
Letson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
532 F. Supp. 500 (N.D. California, 1982)
Garner v. First National City Bank
465 F. Supp. 372 (S.D. New York, 1979)