Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sullo v. State

Sullo v. State

663 So. 2d 11, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12575, 1995 WL 700185
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 29, 1995
DocketNo. 95-2587
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 663 So. 2d 11 (Sullo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sullo v. State, 663 So. 2d 11, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12575, 1995 WL 700185 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order summarily denying his rule 3.800(a) motion. Following Fountain v. State, 660 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), we reverse the trial court’s order and remand for further proceedings. If the record can answer the question of whether appellant is entitled to jail time credit, the rule 3.800(a) motion is appropriate for seeking relief. If that fact cannot be determined from the record, the rule 3.800(a) motion should be denied.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DELL, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vanderblomen v. State
709 So. 2d 144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Ford v. State
667 So. 2d 455 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
663 So. 2d 11, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12575, 1995 WL 700185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullo-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.