Sullivan v. Weaver

9 Pa. 223, 1848 Pa. LEXIS 212
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 18, 1848·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Burnside, J.

From proceedings under the compulsory arbitration act, there is no remedy by writ of error. The act of Assembly gives a remedy by appeal, and appeal only. Such has been the uniform course of decision in this court. The cases [224]*224on this subject are collected and reviewed by Mr. Justice Huston in Le Barren v. Harriott et al. 3 Penn. Rep. 154. In Brinter v. Ridenhour, not reported, it was held, after award for the plaintiff,- and no cause of action stated in the declaration, this court would not interfere. We can do nothing for the plaintiff in error. .

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. Weaver, 9 Pa. 223, 1848 Pa. LEXIS 212 (Pa. 1848).

9 Pa. 223 (Sullivan v. Weaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schaeffer v. Commonwealth
4 Walk. 335 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1881)