Sullivan v. Visconti

69 N.J.L. 452
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 15, 1903·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Pitney in that court. 39 Vroom 543.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Garretson, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Voorhees, Vroom. 11. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. Visconti, 69 N.J.L. 452 (N.J. 1903).

69 N.J.L. 452 (Sullivan v. Visconti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Century Financial Services v. Oughla Msw Capital, LLC v. Zaidi
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014
New Century Financial Services Inc. v. Oughla
98 A.3d 583 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014)