Sullivan v. Visconti

69 N.J.L. 452
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 15, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 69 N.J.L. 452 (Sullivan v. Visconti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sullivan v. Visconti, 69 N.J.L. 452 (N.J. 1903).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Pitney in that court. 39 Vroom 543.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Garretson, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Voorhees, Vroom. 11. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New Century Financial Services v. Oughla Msw Capital, LLC v. Zaidi
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014
New Century Financial Services Inc. v. Oughla
98 A.3d 583 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 N.J.L. 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sullivan-v-visconti-nj-1903.