Sullivan v. United States

50 Cust. Ct. 473, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1384
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sullivan v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 Cust. Ct. 31
United States Customs Court·Decided May 16, 1963·No. Reap. Dec. 10514; Entry No. 6926·Published

Opinion

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

Mb. McFakland: * * *
I offer to stipulate as follows:
That the merchandise referred to in this case as Keen Arc Welding Carbons is a carbon product which was manufactured in and exported from the Federal Republic of Germany, commonly referred to as West Germany, on or before August 19,1959;
That said product is the same product as that referred to in the decision of this Court dated August 7, 1962, with respect to Reappraisement R59/16421 and 19 others, and the judgment of this Court with respect thereto, dated August 7, 1962.
It is further stipulated that the export value, as defined by Section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved, and that such value is the invoice unit price, net, packed.
Me. Beaveeman : * * * the Government so stipulates.

Ou the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value is the invoice unit price, net, packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan v. United States, 50 Cust. Ct. 473, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1384 (cusc 1963).

50 Cust. Ct. 473 (Sullivan v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.